WHAT IF Check report

This file was created 1997-08-24 from WHAT_CHECK output by a conversion script. If you are new to WHAT_CHECK, please read the introduction to the output.

Verification log for sys\_haein.lebe

Symmetry related problems

Error: Missing unit cell information

No SCALE matrix is given in the PDB file.

Error: Missing symmetry information

Problem: No CRYST1 card is given in the PDB file.

Atom coordinate problems and/or unexpected atoms

Note: No rounded coordinates detected

No significant rounding of atom coordinates has been detected.

Nomenclature related problems

Note: Valine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in valine nomenclature.

Note: Threonine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in threonine nomenclature.

Note: Isoleucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in isoleucine nomenclature.

Note: Leucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in leucine nomenclature.

Note: Arginine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in arginine nomenclature.

Note: Tyrosine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in tyrosine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Phenylalanine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in phenylalanine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Aspartic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in aspartic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Glutamic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in glutamic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Heavy atom naming OK

No errors were detected in the atom names for non-hydrogen atoms.

Warning: Chirality deviations detected

The atoms listed in the table below have an improper dihedral value that is deviating from expected values.

Improper dihedrals are a measure of the chirality/planarity of the structure at a specific atom. Values around -35 or +35 are expected for chiral atoms, and values around 0 for planar atoms. Planar side chains are left out of the calculations, these are better handled by the planarity checks.

Three numbers are given for each atom in the table. The first is the Z-score for the improper dihedral. The second number is the measured improper dihedral. The third number is the expected value for this atom type. A final column contains an extra warning if the chirality for an atom is opposite to the expected value.

 424 ILE  ( 429 )      C       -4.4     -8.9     -0.2

Note: Improper dihedral angle distribution OK

The RMS Z-score for all improper dihedrals in the structure is within normal ranges.

Improper dihedral RMS Z-score : 0.528

Note: Chain names are OK

All chain names assigned to polymer molecules are unique, and all residue numbers are strictly increasing within each chain.

Note: Weights checked OK

All atomic occupancy factors ('weights') fall in the 0.0--1.0 range.

Geometric checks

Note: No missing atoms detected

All expected atoms are present.

Note: OXT check OK

All required C-terminal oxygen atoms are present.

Note: No extra C-terminal groups found

No C-terminal groups are present for non C-terminal residues

Warning: Unusual bond lengths

The bond lengths listed in the table below were found to deviate more than 4 sigma from standard bond lengths (both standard values and sigma for amino acid residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA they were taken from Parkinson et al [REF]). In the table below for each unusual bond the bond length and the number of standard deviations it differs from the normal value is given.

Atom names starting with "<" belong to the previous residue in the chain. If the second atom name is "--SS", the disulphide bridge has a deviating length.

 244 VAL  ( 249 )      N    CA    1.381  -4.0
 315 ASN  ( 320 )      N    CA    1.540   4.3
 316 LEU  ( 321 )      N    CA    1.374  -4.4

Note: Normal bond length variability

Bond lengths were found to deviate normally from the standard bond lengths (values for Protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]).

RMS Z-score for bond lengths: 0.766
RMS-deviation in bond distances: 0.017

Note: No bond length directionality

Comparison of bond distances with Engh and Huber [REF] standard values for protein residues and Parkinson et al [REF] values for DNA/RNA does not show significant systematic deviations.

Note: All bond angles OK

All bond angles are in agreement with standard bond angles using a tolerance of 4 sigma (both standard values and sigma for protein residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al. [REF]). Please note that only bond angles within protein residues are taken into account: disulphide bridges and peptide bonds are neglected.

Note: Normal bond angle variability

Bond angles were found to deviate normally from the mean standard bond angles (normal values for protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]). The RMS Z-score given below is expected to be around 1.0 for a normally restrained data set, and this is indeed observed for very high resolution X-ray structures. More common values are around 1.55

RMS Z-score for bond angles: 0.886
RMS-deviation in bond angles: 1.783

Note: Side chain planarity OK

All of the side chains of residues that have a planar group are planar within expected RMS deviations.

Note: Atoms connected to aromatic rings OK

All of the atoms that are connected to planar aromatic rings in side chains of amino-acid residues are in the plane within expected RMS deviations.

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering amplitudes

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering amplitude that is outside of normal ranges. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings have a puckering amplitude Q between 0.20 and 0.45 Angstrom. If Q is lower than 0.20 Angstrom for a PRO residue, this could indicate disorder between the two different normal ring forms (with C-gamma below and above the ring, respectively). If Q is higher than 0.45 Angstrom something could have gone wrong during the refinement.

   4 PRO  (   4 )     0.17 LOW
 105 PRO  ( 107 )     0.13 LOW
 194 PRO  ( 196 )     0.13 LOW
 231 PRO  ( 236 )     0.16 LOW
 260 PRO  ( 265 )     0.15 LOW

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering phases

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering phase that is not expected to occur in protein structures. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings approximately show a so-called envelope conformation with the C-gamma atom above the plane of the ring (phi=+72 degrees), or a half-chair conformation with C-gamma below and C-beta above the plane of the ring (phi=-90 degrees). If phi deviates strongly from these values, this is indicative of a very strange conformation for a PRO residue, and definitely requires a manual check of the data.

 226 PRO  ( 228 )     -9.5 half-chair C-alpha/N (-18 degrees)
 343 PRO  ( 348 )    104.8 envelop C-beta (108 degrees)
 411 PRO  ( 416 )     99.8 envelop C-beta (108 degrees)

Warning: Torsion angle evaluation shows unusual residues

The residues listed in the table below contain bad or abnormal torsion angles.

These scores give an impression of how ``normal'' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.

 358 TRP  ( 363 )   -3.2357
 343 PRO  ( 348 )   -2.8409
 347 THR  ( 352 )   -2.7967
 232 THR  ( 237 )   -2.4351
 191 THR  ( 193 )   -2.4106
 388 LEU  ( 393 )   -2.3841
 197 VAL  ( 199 )   -2.2844
 271 ARG  ( 276 )   -2.2219
 181 LEU  ( 183 )   -2.2050
 380 VAL  ( 385 )   -2.1332
  46 GLN  (  48 )   -2.1298
 387 GLY  ( 392 )   -2.1033
 122 LEU  ( 124 )   -2.0847
  22 MET  (  24 )   -2.0804
 421 LEU  ( 426 )   -2.0704
  42 THR  (  44 )   -2.0421
 419 GLY  ( 424 )   -2.0197
 209 PRO  ( 211 )   -2.0045

Warning: Backbone torsion angle evaluation shows unusual conformations

The residues listed in the table below have abnormal backbone torsion angles.

Residues with ``forbidden'' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.

  20 ASN  (  22 )   Poor phi/psi
 156 ALA  ( 158 )   Poor phi/psi
 159 ARG  ( 161 )   Poor phi/psi
 208 LEU  ( 210 )   PRO omega poor
 209 PRO  ( 211 )   Poor PRO-phi
 224 GLU  ( 226 )   Poor phi/psi
 243 ASP  ( 248 )   Poor phi/psi
 251 LEU  ( 256 )   PRO omega poor
 252 PRO  ( 257 )   Poor PRO-phi
 270 GLY  ( 275 )   Poor phi/psi
 271 ARG  ( 276 )   Poor phi/psi
 274 ARG  ( 279 )   Poor phi/psi
 275 GLY  ( 280 )   Poor phi/psi
 343 PRO  ( 348 )   Poor PRO-phi
 344 ALA  ( 349 )   Poor phi/psi
 351 ILE  ( 356 )   Poor phi/psi
 358 TRP  ( 363 )   Poor phi/psi
 366 GLN  ( 371 )   Poor phi/psi
 372 LYS  ( 377 )   Poor phi/psi
 375 LYS  ( 380 )   Poor phi/psi
 387 GLY  ( 392 )   omega poor
 420 GLY  ( 425 )   Poor phi/psi

Note: Ramachandran Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the backbone conformations of all residues are corresponding to the known allowed areas in the Ramachandran plot is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

Ramachandran Z-score : -1.642

Warning: Omega angles too tightly restrained

The omega angles for trans-peptide bonds in a structure are expected to give a gaussian distribution with the average around +178 degrees and a standard deviation around 5.5 degrees. These expected values were obtained from very accurately determined structures. Many protein structures are too tightly constrained. This seems to be the case with the current structure, as the observed standard deviation is below 4.0 degrees.

Standard deviation of omega values : 3.391

Note: chi-1/chi-2 angle correlation Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the chi-1/chi-2 angles of all residues are corresponding to the populated areas in the database is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -2.083

Note: Ramachandran plot

In this Ramachandran plot X-signs represent glycines, squares represent prolines and small plus-signs represent the other residues. If too many plus-signs fall outside the contoured areas then the molecule is poorly refined (or worse).

In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. "Allowed" regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green.

Chain without chain identifier

Accessibility related checks

Note: Inside/Outside residue distribution normal

The distribution of residue types over the inside and the outside of the protein is normal.

inside/outside RMS Z-score : 1.029

Note: Inside/Outside RMS Z-score plot

The Inside/Outside distribution normality RMS Z-score over a 15 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. High areas in the plot (above 1.5) indicate unusual inside/outside patterns.

Chain without chain identifier

Secondary structure

Note: Secondary structure

This is the secondary structure according to DSSP. Only helix (H), strand (S), turn (T) and coil (blank) are shown. [REF]
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
                     10
                      |
    1 -  18  MIDPNLLRNNLAEVAEKL
    1 -  18     HHHHHH HHHHHHH
             20        30        40        50        60        70
              |         |         |         |         |         |
   19 -  78  RNFMLDTEKLTALEDQRKNLQVTTENLQAERNARSKAIGAAKARGEDIAPLLAEMDDMGN
   19 -  78        HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTT   HHHHHHHHHHHH
             80        90       100       110       120       130
              |         |         |         |         |         |
   79 - 138  QLTEAKAQLDAVLAEINQIALSIPNLPADEVPLGKDDTENKEILRWGTPRTFDFEVKDHI
   79 - 138  HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHT      TTT   TT333       T     TT    HH
            140       150       160       170       180       190
              |         |         |         |         |         |
  139 - 198  TLGEEANGLDFAAGAKLAGARFAVMKGQIAKMHRALAQFMLDLHTEQHGYLETYVPYLVN
  139 - 198  HHHHHTT   HHHHHHHT TT     HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTT        TT
            200       210       220
              |         |         |
  199 - 226  HATLYGTGQLPKFGEDLFHTLALEGEQP
  199 - 226  HHHHHHHT TTTT333T       TT
              230       240       250       260       270       280
                |         |         |         |         |         |
  227 - 286  YALIPTAEVPVTNLVRDVIIDEAELPIKMTAHTPCFRSEAGSYGRDTRGLIRMHQFDKVE
  227 - 286      TTTHHHHHHTTTT SSS333  SSSSSSSSSS T      TT  T    TSSSSSS
              290       300       310       320       330       340
                |         |         |         |         |         |
  287 - 346  MVQIVDPDKSMEALEELTGHAEKVLQLLNLPYRKVLLCTGDMGFGSCKTYDLEVWVPAQN
  287 - 346  SSSSS 333HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHT  SSSSS  333T TT TSSSSSSSSS333T
              350       360       370       380       390       400
                |         |         |         |         |         |
  347 - 406  TYREISSCSNMWDFQARRMQARCKAKGDKKTRLVHTLNGSGLAVGRTLVAVLENYQNADG
  347 - 406  SSSSSSSSSS TTHHHHHHT SSS TTT  SSS SSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHT  TTT
              410       420
                |         |
  407 - 425  SITVPEELRPYMGGLDVIG
  407 - 425   SS  TTT333TTT  SS
 
 
 

Bump checks

Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances

The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short distance.

The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centers of the two atoms.

The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. The text `INTRA' means that the bump is between atoms that are explicitly listed in the PDB file. `INTER' means it is an inter-symmetry bump. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterium was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1--3 and 1--4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). If the last column is 'BF', the sum of the B-factors of the atoms is higher than 80, which makes the appearance of the bump somewhat less severe because the atoms probably aren't there anyway.

Bumps between atoms for which the sum of their occupancies is lower than one are not reported. In any case, each bump is listed in only one direction.

 311 LEU  ( 316 )      O    --  315 ASN  ( 320 )      N      0.604   1.946 INTRA HB
 247 ASP  ( 252 )      O    --  250 GLU  ( 255 )      CG     0.339   2.461 INTRA
 300 LEU  ( 305 )      O    --  304 THR  ( 309 )      CG2    0.330   2.470 INTRA
  10 ASN  (  10 )      O    --   11 LEU  (  11 )      C      0.310   2.490 INTRA BF
 311 LEU  ( 316 )      O    --  315 ASN  ( 320 )      CA     0.301   2.499 INTRA
 420 GLY  ( 425 )      O    --  421 LEU  ( 426 )      C      0.265   2.535 INTRA
 312 GLN  ( 317 )      O    --  315 ASN  ( 320 )      N      0.253   2.447 INTRA
 237 VAL  ( 242 )      CG1  --  288 VAL  ( 293 )      CG2    0.246   2.954 INTRA
 147 LEU  ( 149 )      CD2  --  149 PHE  ( 151 )      CE2    0.238   2.962 INTRA
 201 THR  ( 203 )      CG2  --  239 ASN  ( 244 )      ND2    0.237   2.863 INTRA
 382 THR  ( 387 )      C    --  383 LEU  ( 388 )      CD2    0.234   2.966 INTRA
 324 CYS  ( 329 )      O    --  325 THR  ( 330 )      C      0.228   2.572 INTRA
 410 VAL  ( 415 )      O    --  411 PRO  ( 416 )      C      0.215   2.585 INTRA
 159 ARG  ( 161 )      CZ   --  277 ILE  ( 282 )      CD1    0.207   2.993 INTRA BF
 356 ASN  ( 361 )      ND2  --  358 TRP  ( 363 )      N      0.188   2.812 INTRA
 124 TRP  ( 126 )      CH2  --  315 ASN  ( 320 )      CB     0.187   3.013 INTRA
 393 THR  ( 398 )      O    --  397 VAL  ( 402 )      CG1    0.180   2.620 INTRA
 258 HIS  ( 263 )      C    --  259 THR  ( 264 )      CG2    0.180   3.020 INTRA
   9 ASN  (   9 )      O    --   10 ASN  (  10 )      ND2    0.176   2.524 INTRA
 343 PRO  ( 348 )      O    --  345 GLN  ( 350 )      N      0.167   2.533 INTRA
  67 ALA  (  69 )      N    --   68 PRO  (  70 )      CD     0.166   2.834 INTRA BF
  11 LEU  (  11 )      CB   --   25 THR  (  27 )      CG2    0.160   3.040 INTRA
   9 ASN  (   9 )      O    --   10 ASN  (  10 )      CG     0.158   2.642 INTRA
 182 HIS  ( 184 )      ND1  --  186 HIS  ( 188 )      CD2    0.157   2.943 INTRA
 322 LEU  ( 327 )      CD1  --  336 TYR  ( 341 )      CE1    0.156   3.044 INTRA
And so on for a total of 113 lines

3D-database related checks

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.

The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.

 192 TYR  ( 194 )    -8.61
 225 GLN  ( 227 )    -7.24
 274 ARG  ( 279 )    -7.22
 221 LEU  ( 223 )    -6.79
 278 ARG  ( 283 )    -6.14
 111 LEU  ( 113 )    -5.77
 345 GLN  ( 350 )    -5.58
 113 LYS  ( 115 )    -5.40
 271 ARG  ( 276 )    -5.18
 123 ARG  ( 125 )    -5.08

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for sequential residues

A stretch of at least three sequential residues with a questionable packing environment was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop, but might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue score of the series.

 224 GLU  ( 226 )     ---  226 PRO  ( 228 )      -5.44

Note: Structural average packing environment OK

The structural average quality control value is within normal ranges.

Average for range 1 - 425 : -0.753

Note: Quality value plot

The quality value smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -2.0) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment according to the 2nd generation quality check. The score listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the "unusual" residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a special look at them.

 192 TYR  ( 194 )    -2.61
 186 HIS  ( 188 )    -2.52

Warning: Abnormal packing Z-score for sequential residues

A stretch of at least four sequential residues with a 2nd generation packing Z-score below -1.75 was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop or that the residues in this range are incomplete, but it might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue Z-score of the series.

 274 ARG  ( 279 )     ---  277 ILE  ( 282 )      -2.12

Note: Structural average packing Z-score OK

The structural average for the second generation quality control value is within normal ranges.

All contacts : Average = -0.069 Z-score = -0.30
BB-BB contacts : Average = 0.191 Z-score = 1.38
BB-SC contacts : Average = -0.369 Z-score = -1.94
SC-BB contacts : Average = 0.095 Z-score = 0.75
SC-SC contacts : Average = -0.222 Z-score = -0.90

Note: Second generation quality Z-score plot

The second generation quality Z-score smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -1.3) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Note: Backbone oxygen evaluation OK

All residues for which the local backbone conformation could be found in the WHAT IF database have a normal backbone oxygen position.

Warning: Unusual rotamers

The residues listed in the table below have a rotamer that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. This option determines for every residue the position specific chi-1 rotamer distribution. Thereafter it verified whether the actual residue in the molecule has the most preferred rotamer or not. If the actual rotamer is the preferred one, the score is 1.0. If the actual rotamer is unique, the score is 0.0. If there are two preferred rotamers, with a population distribution of 3:2 and your rotamer sits in the lesser populated rotamer, the score will be 0.66. No value will be given if insufficient hits are found in the database.

It is not necessarily an error if a few residues have rotamer values below 0.3, but careful inspection of all residues with these low values could be worth it.

 412 GLU  ( 417 )     0.33
 384 ASN  ( 389 )     0.38

Warning: Unusual backbone conformations

For the residues listed in the table below, the backbone formed by itself and two neighboring residues on either side is in a conformation that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. The number given in the table is the number of similar backbone conformations in the database with the same amino acid in the center.

For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.

A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!

 156 ALA  ( 158 )    0
 208 LEU  ( 210 )    0
 271 ARG  ( 276 )    0
 314 LEU  ( 319 )    0
 358 TRP  ( 363 )    0
 372 LYS  ( 377 )    0
 374 ASP  ( 379 )    0
 388 LEU  ( 393 )    0
 132 PHE  ( 134 )    1
 164 LYS  ( 166 )    1
 224 GLU  ( 226 )    1
 251 LEU  ( 256 )    1
 166 GLN  ( 168 )    2
 222 GLU  ( 224 )    2
 357 MET  ( 362 )    2

Note: Backbone conformation Z-score OK

The backbone conformation analysis gives a score that is normal for well refined protein structures.

Backbone conformation Z-score : -0.169

B-factor analysis

Note: Average B-factor OK

The average B-factor of buried atoms is within expected values for a room-temperature X-ray study.

Average B-factor for buried atoms : 24.258

Note: Number of buried atoms with low B-factor is OK

For protein structures determined at room temperature, no more than about 1 percent of the B factors of buried atoms is below 5.0.

Percentage of buried atoms with B less than 5 : 0.27

Error: The B-factors of bonded atoms show signs of over-refinement

For each of the bond types in a protein a distribution was derived for the difference between the square roots of the B-factors of the two atoms. All bonds in the current protein were scored against these distributions. The number given below is the RMS Z-score over the structure. For a structure with completely restrained B-factors within residues, this value will be around 0.35, for extremely high resolution structures refined with free isotropic B-factors this number is expected to be near 1.0. Any value over 1.5 is sign of severe over-refinement of B-factors.

RMS Z-score : 1.515 over 2790 bonds
Average difference in B over a bond : 2.19
RMS difference in B over a bond : 4.85

Note: B-factor plot

The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue number.

Chain without chain identifier

Hydrogen bond related checks

Error: HIS, ASN, GLN side chain flips

Listed here are Histidine, Asparagine or Glutamine residues for which the orientation determined from hydrogen bonding analysis are different from the assignment given in the input. Either they could form energetically more favorable hydrogen bonds if the terminal group was rotated by 180 degrees, or there is no assignment in the input file (atom type 'A') but an assignment could be made. If a residue is marked ``flexible'' the flipped conformation is only slightly better than the non-flipped conformation.

 186 HIS  ( 188 )
 217 HIS  ( 219 )
 356 ASN  ( 361 )

Note: Histidine type assignments

For all complete HIS residues in the structure a tentative assignment to HIS-D (protonated on ND1), HIS-E (protonated on NE2), or HIS-H (protonated on both ND1 and NE2, positively charged) is made based on the hydrogen bond network. A second assignment is made based on which of the Engh and Huber [REF] histidine geometries fits best to the structure.

In the table below all normal histidine residues are listed. The assignment based on the geometry of the residue is listed first, together with the RMS Z-score for the fit to the Engh and Huber parameters. For all residues where the H-bond assignment is different, the assignment is listed in the last columns, together with its RMS Z-score to the Engh and Huber parameters.

As always, the RMS Z-scores should be close to 1.0 if the residues were restrained to the Engh and Huber parameters during refinement.

Please note that because the differences between the geometries of the different types are small it is possible that the geometric assignment given here does not correspond to the type used in refinement. This is especially true if the RMS Z-scores are much higher than 1.0.

If the two assignments differ, or the ``geometry'' RMS Z-score is high, it is advisable to verify the hydrogen bond assignment, check the HIS type used during the refinement and possibly adjust it.

 137 HIS  ( 139 )     HIS-E   0.74 HIS-D   0.80
 171 HIS  ( 173 )     HIS-D   0.76 HIS-E   0.90
 182 HIS  ( 184 )     HIS-D   0.79 HIS-E   0.91
 186 HIS  ( 188 )     HIS-D   0.79
 199 HIS  ( 201 )     HIS-D   0.71 HIS-E   0.89
 217 HIS  ( 219 )     HIS-D   0.70 HIS-E   0.85
 258 HIS  ( 263 )     HIS-D   0.77 HIS-E   0.89
 280 HIS  ( 285 )     HIS-D   0.70
 306 HIS  ( 311 )     HIS-E   0.77
 381 HIS  ( 386 )     HIS-E   0.71

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors

The buried hydrogen bond donors listed in the table below have a hydrogen atom that is not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.

   1 MET  (   1 )      N
  20 ASN  (  22 )      N
  21 PHE  (  23 )      N
  42 THR  (  44 )      OG1
 114 ASP  ( 116 )      N
 118 ASN  ( 120 )      N
 138 ILE  ( 140 )      N
 147 LEU  ( 149 )      N
 160 PHE  ( 162 )      N
 210 LYS  ( 212 )      N
 216 PHE  ( 218 )      N
 232 THR  ( 237 )      N
 233 ALA  ( 238 )      N
 265 GLU  ( 270 )      N
 274 ARG  ( 279 )      NH2
 275 GLY  ( 280 )      N
 276 LEU  ( 281 )      N
 281 GLN  ( 286 )      N
 319 ARG  ( 324 )      NE
 335 THR  ( 340 )      N
 347 THR  ( 352 )      N
 348 TYR  ( 353 )      N
 359 ASP  ( 364 )      N
 361 GLN  ( 366 )      N
 362 ALA  ( 367 )      N
 364 ARG  ( 369 )      NE
 364 ARG  ( 369 )      NH2
 372 LYS  ( 377 )      N
 374 ASP  ( 379 )      N
 375 LYS  ( 380 )      N
 376 LYS  ( 381 )      N
 413 GLU  ( 418 )      N

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond acceptors

The buried side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors listed in the table below are not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors that are buried inside the protein normally form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any not hydrogen bonded in the optimized hydrogen bond network they will be listed here.

  79 GLN  (  81 )      OE1
 286 GLU  ( 291 )      OE1

Final summary

Note: Summary report for users of a structure

This is an overall summary of the quality of the structure as compared with current reliable structures. This summary is most useful for biologists seeking a good structure to use for modelling calculations.

The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement constraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of constraint-independent quality indicators.


Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:

  1st generation packing quality :  -0.633
  2nd generation packing quality :  -0.301
  Ramachandran plot appearance   :  -1.642
  chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality  :  -2.083
  Backbone conformation          :  -0.169

RMS Z-scores, should be close to 1.0:
  Bond lengths                   :   0.766
  Bond angles                    :   0.886
  Omega angle restraints         :   0.617 (tight)
  Side chain planarity           :   0.052 (tight)
  Improper dihedral distribution :   0.528
  B-factor distribution          :   1.515 (loose)
  Inside/Outside distribution    :   1.029