WHAT IF Check report

This file was created 1997-08-24 from WHAT_CHECK output by a conversion script. If you are new to WHAT_CHECK, please read the introduction to the output.

Verification log for sys\_halma.lebe

Symmetry related problems

Error: Missing unit cell information

No SCALE matrix is given in the PDB file.

Error: Missing symmetry information

Problem: No CRYST1 card is given in the PDB file.

Atom coordinate problems and/or unexpected atoms

Note: No rounded coordinates detected

No significant rounding of atom coordinates has been detected.

Nomenclature related problems

Note: Valine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in valine nomenclature.

Note: Threonine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in threonine nomenclature.

Note: Isoleucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in isoleucine nomenclature.

Note: Leucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in leucine nomenclature.

Note: Arginine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in arginine nomenclature.

Note: Tyrosine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in tyrosine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Phenylalanine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in phenylalanine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Aspartic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in aspartic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Glutamic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in glutamic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Heavy atom naming OK

No errors were detected in the atom names for non-hydrogen atoms.

Note: Chirality OK

All protein atoms have proper chirality.

Note: Improper dihedral angle distribution OK

The RMS Z-score for all improper dihedrals in the structure is within normal ranges.

Improper dihedral RMS Z-score : 0.508

Note: Chain names are OK

All chain names assigned to polymer molecules are unique, and all residue numbers are strictly increasing within each chain.

Note: Weights checked OK

All atomic occupancy factors ('weights') fall in the 0.0--1.0 range.

Geometric checks

Note: No missing atoms detected

All expected atoms are present.

Warning: C-terminal oxygen atoms missing

The C-atoms listed in the table below belong to a C-terminal residue in a protein chain, but the C-terminal oxygen ("O2" or "OXT") that it should be bound to was not found.

 418 ILE  ( 429 )      C

Note: No extra C-terminal groups found

No C-terminal groups are present for non C-terminal residues

Note: All bond lengths OK

All bond lengths are in agreement with standard bond lengths using a tolerance of 4 sigma (both standard values and sigma for amino acid residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF])

Note: Normal bond length variability

Bond lengths were found to deviate normally from the standard bond lengths (values for Protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]).

RMS Z-score for bond lengths: 0.763
RMS-deviation in bond distances: 0.017

Note: No bond length directionality

Comparison of bond distances with Engh and Huber [REF] standard values for protein residues and Parkinson et al [REF] values for DNA/RNA does not show significant systematic deviations.

Note: All bond angles OK

All bond angles are in agreement with standard bond angles using a tolerance of 4 sigma (both standard values and sigma for protein residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al. [REF]). Please note that only bond angles within protein residues are taken into account: disulphide bridges and peptide bonds are neglected.

Note: Normal bond angle variability

Bond angles were found to deviate normally from the mean standard bond angles (normal values for protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]). The RMS Z-score given below is expected to be around 1.0 for a normally restrained data set, and this is indeed observed for very high resolution X-ray structures. More common values are around 1.55

RMS Z-score for bond angles: 0.901
RMS-deviation in bond angles: 1.806

Note: Side chain planarity OK

All of the side chains of residues that have a planar group are planar within expected RMS deviations.

Note: Atoms connected to aromatic rings OK

All of the atoms that are connected to planar aromatic rings in side chains of amino-acid residues are in the plane within expected RMS deviations.

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering amplitudes

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering amplitude that is outside of normal ranges. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings have a puckering amplitude Q between 0.20 and 0.45 Angstrom. If Q is lower than 0.20 Angstrom for a PRO residue, this could indicate disorder between the two different normal ring forms (with C-gamma below and above the ring, respectively). If Q is higher than 0.45 Angstrom something could have gone wrong during the refinement.

 103 PRO  ( 107 )     0.13 LOW
 227 PRO  ( 236 )     0.16 LOW
 256 PRO  ( 265 )     0.16 LOW

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering phases

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering phase that is not expected to occur in protein structures. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings approximately show a so-called envelope conformation with the C-gamma atom above the plane of the ring (phi=+72 degrees), or a half-chair conformation with C-gamma below and C-beta above the plane of the ring (phi=-90 degrees). If phi deviates strongly from these values, this is indicative of a very strange conformation for a PRO residue, and definitely requires a manual check of the data.

  11 PRO  (  11 )     99.6 envelop C-beta (108 degrees)
 191 PRO  ( 198 )    -21.2 half-chair C-alpha/N (-18 degrees)
 339 PRO  ( 348 )    102.6 envelop C-beta (108 degrees)

Warning: Torsion angle evaluation shows unusual residues

The residues listed in the table below contain bad or abnormal torsion angles.

These scores give an impression of how ``normal'' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.

 339 PRO  ( 348 )   -2.7713
 228 THR  ( 237 )   -2.4351
 382 LEU  ( 393 )   -2.3378
 192 VAL  ( 199 )   -2.3084
 141 ASP  ( 147 )   -2.2900
 351 PHE  ( 362 )   -2.2111
 381 GLY  ( 392 )   -2.0921
 413 GLY  ( 424 )   -2.0664

Warning: Backbone torsion angle evaluation shows unusual conformations

The residues listed in the table below have abnormal backbone torsion angles.

Residues with ``forbidden'' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.

 142 LEU  ( 148 )   omega poor
 152 SER  ( 158 )   Poor phi/psi
 188 PRO  ( 195 )   Poor PRO-phi, PRO omega poor
 189 PRO  ( 196 )   Poor PRO-phi
 191 PRO  ( 198 )   Poor PRO-phi
 203 LEU  ( 210 )   PRO omega poor
 204 PRO  ( 211 )   Poor PRO-phi
 247 LEU  ( 256 )   PRO omega poor
 248 PRO  ( 257 )   Poor PRO-phi
 266 GLY  ( 275 )   Poor phi/psi
 267 THR  ( 276 )   Poor phi/psi
 270 ARG  ( 279 )   Poor phi/psi
 271 GLY  ( 280 )   Poor phi/psi
 311 GLU  ( 320 )   Poor phi/psi
 339 PRO  ( 348 )   Poor PRO-phi
 340 GLY  ( 349 )   Poor phi/psi
 345 VAL  ( 356 )   Poor phi/psi
 352 GLU  ( 363 )   Poor phi/psi
 366 GLU  ( 377 )   Poor phi/psi
 369 GLU  ( 380 )   Poor phi/psi
 381 GLY  ( 392 )   omega poor
 414 GLY  ( 425 )   Poor phi/psi

Note: Ramachandran Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the backbone conformations of all residues are corresponding to the known allowed areas in the Ramachandran plot is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

Ramachandran Z-score : -1.588

Warning: Omega angles too tightly restrained

The omega angles for trans-peptide bonds in a structure are expected to give a gaussian distribution with the average around +178 degrees and a standard deviation around 5.5 degrees. These expected values were obtained from very accurately determined structures. Many protein structures are too tightly constrained. This seems to be the case with the current structure, as the observed standard deviation is below 4.0 degrees.

Standard deviation of omega values : 3.621

Note: chi-1/chi-2 angle correlation Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the chi-1/chi-2 angles of all residues are corresponding to the populated areas in the database is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -0.823

Note: Ramachandran plot

In this Ramachandran plot X-signs represent glycines, squares represent prolines and small plus-signs represent the other residues. If too many plus-signs fall outside the contoured areas then the molecule is poorly refined (or worse).

In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. "Allowed" regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green.

Chain without chain identifier

Accessibility related checks

Note: Inside/Outside residue distribution normal

The distribution of residue types over the inside and the outside of the protein is normal.

inside/outside RMS Z-score : 1.052

Note: Inside/Outside RMS Z-score plot

The Inside/Outside distribution normality RMS Z-score over a 15 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. High areas in the plot (above 1.5) indicate unusual inside/outside patterns.

Chain without chain identifier

Secondary structure

Note: Secondary structure

This is the secondary structure according to DSSP. Only helix (H), strand (S), turn (T) and coil (blank) are shown. [REF]
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
                     10        20
                      |         |
    1 -  22  MLSRQFVREHPETVRDAIERKG
    1 -  22     HHHHHH HHHHHHHHHTT
                   30        40        50        60
                    |         |         |         |
   23 -  69  VDLDEILDIDEEWRELKAEGDGLRQERNEVSSKIGELKQDGKDEEAQ
   23 -  69    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHTT   TT
            70        80        90       100       110       120
             |         |         |         |         |         |
   70 - 124  RSQELKDELQDIEERADELESQLEEALLELPNIPHESVPTGEGEADNVERYREGF
   70 - 124   HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHT      TTT   TT333
                130       140       150       160       170       180
                  |         |         |         |         |         |
  125 - 181  DLPDEVVPHYDLGEDLDLLDFERGAKVSGGGYQFVKGEGARLEHALIQFMLDVHREQ
  125 - 181    TT    HHHHHHHTT   HHHHHHHT TT     HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
                   190       200       210
                     |         |         |
  182 - 219  EYVDVLPPIPVNSDSMEGTGQLPKFAEDAYRVGARQDD
  182 - 219          TT  HHHHHHHT TTTT333T
           220       230       240       250       260       270
             |         |         |         |         |         |
  220 - 279  SDDLWLLPTAEVPVTNMYRGEILLDDDLPVKHQAFSPNFRREAGEHGTETRGYVRVHQFH
  220 - 279         T THHHHHHTTTT    333  SSSSSSSSSS T      TT  T    TSSS
           280       290       300       310       320       330
             |         |         |         |         |         |
  280 - 339  KVELVNFVRPENSYDRLESLLDEAAEVLDRLELPYRVLDMCTGDMGFTQAKKYDIEVWAP
  280 - 339  SSSSSSS  333HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHT  SSSSS  TTTT TT TT SSSSS  T
           340
             |
  340 - 341  GD
  340 - 341  T
                   350       360       370       380       390       400
                     |         |         |         |         |         |
  342 - 401  WLEVSSVSNFEDFQARRAGLRYRPERHESADYLHTLNGSGLAVPRVLVAIMEYYQNDDGT
  342 - 401        SSS TTHHHHHHT SS  TTT   SS   SSS T  HHHHHHHHHHHT  TTT
                   410
                     |
  402 - 418  ITVPEPLRPYMGGQEVI
  402 - 418      TTT333TTT
 
 
 

Bump checks

Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances

The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short distance.

The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centers of the two atoms.

The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. The text `INTRA' means that the bump is between atoms that are explicitly listed in the PDB file. `INTER' means it is an inter-symmetry bump. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterium was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1--3 and 1--4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). If the last column is 'BF', the sum of the B-factors of the atoms is higher than 80, which makes the appearance of the bump somewhat less severe because the atoms probably aren't there anyway.

Bumps between atoms for which the sum of their occupancies is lower than one are not reported. In any case, each bump is listed in only one direction.

 365 PRO  ( 376 )      CD   --  370 SER  ( 381 )      O      0.892   1.908 INTRA
 190 ILE  ( 197 )      N    --  191 PRO  ( 198 )      CD     0.835   2.165 INTRA
 351 PHE  ( 362 )      CE2  --  378 ASN  ( 389 )      OD1    0.698   2.102 INTRA
 237 TYR  ( 246 )      CB   --  361 LEU  ( 372 )      CD2    0.610   2.590 INTRA
 223 LEU  ( 232 )      C    --  224 TRP  ( 233 )      CD1    0.499   2.701 INTRA
 327 THR  ( 336 )      CB   --  351 PHE  ( 362 )      CE1    0.489   2.711 INTRA
 237 TYR  ( 246 )      O    --  361 LEU  ( 372 )      CG     0.426   2.374 INTRA
 363 TYR  ( 374 )      CZ   --  372 ASP  ( 383 )      CB     0.415   2.785 INTRA
 351 PHE  ( 362 )      CZ   --  378 ASN  ( 389 )      OD1    0.409   2.391 INTRA
 189 PRO  ( 196 )      C    --  191 PRO  ( 198 )      CD     0.366   2.834 INTRA
  10 HIS  (  10 )      CB   --   13 THR  (  13 )      OG1    0.354   2.446 INTRA
  10 HIS  (  10 )      O    --   11 PRO  (  11 )      C      0.350   2.450 INTRA BF
 143 LEU  ( 149 )      CD2  --  145 PHE  ( 151 )      CE2    0.341   2.859 INTRA
 307 LEU  ( 316 )      O    --  311 GLU  ( 320 )      N      0.303   2.247 INTRA HB
 336 VAL  ( 345 )      CG2  --  345 VAL  ( 356 )      CG1    0.292   2.908 INTRA
 308 ASP  ( 317 )      O    --  311 GLU  ( 320 )      N      0.275   2.425 INTRA
 336 VAL  ( 345 )      CG2  --  345 VAL  ( 356 )      CG2    0.270   2.930 INTRA
 237 TYR  ( 246 )      C    --  361 LEU  ( 372 )      CD1    0.265   2.935 INTRA
 363 TYR  ( 374 )      CE2  --  372 ASP  ( 383 )      CB     0.257   2.943 INTRA
 414 GLY  ( 425 )      O    --  415 GLN  ( 426 )      C      0.254   2.546 INTRA
 140 LEU  ( 146 )      CB   --  142 LEU  ( 148 )      CG     0.246   2.954 INTRA
 327 THR  ( 336 )      O    --  351 PHE  ( 362 )      CD1    0.234   2.566 INTRA
 320 CYS  ( 329 )      O    --  321 THR  ( 330 )      C      0.229   2.571 INTRA
  10 HIS  (  10 )      N    --   11 PRO  (  11 )      CD     0.217   2.783 INTRA BF
 350 ASN  ( 361 )      ND2  --  352 GLU  ( 363 )      N      0.213   2.787 INTRA
And so on for a total of 182 lines

3D-database related checks

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.

The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.

 216 ARG  ( 223 )    -7.91
 367 ARG  ( 378 )    -7.45
 270 ARG  ( 279 )    -7.26
 187 LEU  ( 194 )    -7.06
 274 ARG  ( 283 )    -6.87
 264 GLU  ( 273 )    -6.42
 217 GLN  ( 224 )    -5.85
 111 GLU  ( 115 )    -5.77
  61 GLN  (  63 )    -5.70
 119 ARG  ( 123 )    -5.68
 268 GLU  ( 277 )    -5.43
 358 ARG  ( 369 )    -5.33
 180 GLU  ( 186 )    -5.07
   9 GLU  (   9 )    -5.02

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for sequential residues

A stretch of at least three sequential residues with a questionable packing environment was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop, but might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue score of the series.

 216 ARG  ( 223 )     ---  219 ASP  ( 226 )      -5.73

Note: Structural average packing environment OK

The structural average quality control value is within normal ranges.

Average for range 1 - 418 : -0.765

Note: Quality value plot

The quality value smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -2.0) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment according to the 2nd generation quality check. The score listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the "unusual" residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a special look at them.

 124 PHE  ( 128 )    -2.87
 372 ASP  ( 383 )    -2.78
 128 ASP  ( 134 )    -2.61
 236 MET  ( 245 )    -2.57

Warning: Abnormal packing Z-score for sequential residues

A stretch of at least four sequential residues with a 2nd generation packing Z-score below -1.75 was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop or that the residues in this range are incomplete, but it might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue Z-score of the series.

 270 ARG  ( 279 )     ---  275 VAL  ( 284 )      -2.18

Note: Structural average packing Z-score OK

The structural average for the second generation quality control value is within normal ranges.

All contacts : Average = -0.058 Z-score = -0.23
BB-BB contacts : Average = 0.209 Z-score = 1.50
BB-SC contacts : Average = -0.362 Z-score = -1.90
SC-BB contacts : Average = 0.162 Z-score = 1.15
SC-SC contacts : Average = -0.255 Z-score = -1.09

Note: Second generation quality Z-score plot

The second generation quality Z-score smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -1.3) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Warning: Backbone oxygen evaluation

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual backbone oxygen position.

For each of the residues in the structure, a search was performed to find 5-residue stretches in the WHAT IF database with superposable C-alpha coordinates, and some constraints on the neighboring backbone oxygens.

In the following table the RMS distance between the backbone oxygen positions of these matching structures in the database and the position of the backbone oxygen atom in the current residue is given. If this number is larger than 1.5 a significant number of structures in the database show an alternative position for the backbone oxygen. If the number is larger than 2.0 most matching backbone fragments in the database have the peptide plane flipped. A manual check needs to be performed to assess whether the experimental data can support that alternative as well. The number in the last column is the number of database hits (maximum 80) used in the calculation. It is "normal" that some glycine residues show up in this list, but they are still worth checking!

 154 GLY  ( 160 )    3.13   13

Warning: Unusual rotamers

The residues listed in the table below have a rotamer that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. This option determines for every residue the position specific chi-1 rotamer distribution. Thereafter it verified whether the actual residue in the molecule has the most preferred rotamer or not. If the actual rotamer is the preferred one, the score is 1.0. If the actual rotamer is unique, the score is 0.0. If there are two preferred rotamers, with a population distribution of 3:2 and your rotamer sits in the lesser populated rotamer, the score will be 0.66. No value will be given if insufficient hits are found in the database.

It is not necessarily an error if a few residues have rotamer values below 0.3, but careful inspection of all residues with these low values could be worth it.

 378 ASN  ( 389 )     0.38
 280 LYS  ( 289 )     0.40

Warning: Unusual backbone conformations

For the residues listed in the table below, the backbone formed by itself and two neighboring residues on either side is in a conformation that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. The number given in the table is the number of similar backbone conformations in the database with the same amino acid in the center.

For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.

A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!

 152 SER  ( 158 )    0
 191 PRO  ( 198 )    0
 203 LEU  ( 210 )    0
 267 THR  ( 276 )    0
 366 GLU  ( 377 )    0
 368 HIS  ( 379 )    0
 382 LEU  ( 393 )    0
 160 LYS  ( 166 )    1
 247 LEU  ( 256 )    1
 352 GLU  ( 363 )    1
 128 ASP  ( 134 )    2
 142 LEU  ( 148 )    2
 217 GLN  ( 224 )    2
 351 PHE  ( 362 )    2

Note: Backbone conformation Z-score OK

The backbone conformation analysis gives a score that is normal for well refined protein structures.

Backbone conformation Z-score : 0.408

B-factor analysis

Note: Average B-factor OK

The average B-factor of buried atoms is within expected values for a room-temperature X-ray study.

Average B-factor for buried atoms : 22.795

Note: Number of buried atoms with low B-factor is OK

For protein structures determined at room temperature, no more than about 1 percent of the B factors of buried atoms is below 5.0.

Percentage of buried atoms with B less than 5 : 0.00

Error: The B-factors of bonded atoms show signs of over-refinement

For each of the bond types in a protein a distribution was derived for the difference between the square roots of the B-factors of the two atoms. All bonds in the current protein were scored against these distributions. The number given below is the RMS Z-score over the structure. For a structure with completely restrained B-factors within residues, this value will be around 0.35, for extremely high resolution structures refined with free isotropic B-factors this number is expected to be near 1.0. Any value over 1.5 is sign of severe over-refinement of B-factors.

RMS Z-score : 1.986 over 2911 bonds
Average difference in B over a bond : 2.39
RMS difference in B over a bond : 6.04

Note: B-factor plot

The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue number.

Chain without chain identifier

Hydrogen bond related checks

Error: HIS, ASN, GLN side chain flips

Listed here are Histidine, Asparagine or Glutamine residues for which the orientation determined from hydrogen bonding analysis are different from the assignment given in the input. Either they could form energetically more favorable hydrogen bonds if the terminal group was rotated by 180 degrees, or there is no assignment in the input file (atom type 'A') but an assignment could be made. If a residue is marked ``flexible'' the flipped conformation is only slightly better than the non-flipped conformation.

 350 ASN  ( 361 )

Note: Histidine type assignments

For all complete HIS residues in the structure a tentative assignment to HIS-D (protonated on ND1), HIS-E (protonated on NE2), or HIS-H (protonated on both ND1 and NE2, positively charged) is made based on the hydrogen bond network. A second assignment is made based on which of the Engh and Huber [REF] histidine geometries fits best to the structure.

In the table below all normal histidine residues are listed. The assignment based on the geometry of the residue is listed first, together with the RMS Z-score for the fit to the Engh and Huber parameters. For all residues where the H-bond assignment is different, the assignment is listed in the last columns, together with its RMS Z-score to the Engh and Huber parameters.

As always, the RMS Z-scores should be close to 1.0 if the residues were restrained to the Engh and Huber parameters during refinement.

Please note that because the differences between the geometries of the different types are small it is possible that the geometric assignment given here does not correspond to the type used in refinement. This is especially true if the RMS Z-scores are much higher than 1.0.

If the two assignments differ, or the ``geometry'' RMS Z-score is high, it is advisable to verify the hydrogen bond assignment, check the HIS type used during the refinement and possibly adjust it.

  10 HIS  (  10 )     HIS-E   0.88
 104 HIS  ( 108 )     HIS-E   0.77
 133 HIS  ( 139 )     HIS-E   0.64 HIS-D   0.81
 168 HIS  ( 174 )     HIS-E   0.66 HIS-D   0.95
 178 HIS  ( 184 )     HIS-D   0.80 HIS-E   0.89
 251 HIS  ( 260 )     HIS-E   0.80 HIS-H   1.03
 265 HIS  ( 274 )     HIS-D   0.70
 276 HIS  ( 285 )     HIS-D   0.79
 279 HIS  ( 288 )     HIS-D   0.76
 368 HIS  ( 379 )     HIS-D   0.81 HIS-E   0.90
 375 HIS  ( 386 )     HIS-E   0.77

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors

The buried hydrogen bond donors listed in the table below have a hydrogen atom that is not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.

   1 MET  (   1 )      N
  13 THR  (  13 )      N
  20 ARG  (  20 )      NE
 111 GLU  ( 115 )      N
 116 ASN  ( 120 )      N
 134 TYR  ( 140 )      N
 143 LEU  ( 149 )      N
 156 TYR  ( 162 )      N
 205 LYS  ( 212 )      N
 211 TYR  ( 218 )      N
 228 THR  ( 237 )      N
 245 ASP  ( 254 )      N
 252 GLN  ( 261 )      NE2
 277 GLN  ( 286 )      N
 279 HIS  ( 288 )      N
 279 HIS  ( 288 )      ND1
 285 ASN  ( 294 )      ND2
 294 ASP  ( 303 )      N
 315 ARG  ( 324 )      NE
 331 LYS  ( 340 )      N
 353 ASP  ( 364 )      N
 355 GLN  ( 366 )      N
 358 ARG  ( 369 )      NE
 358 ARG  ( 369 )      NH2
 366 GLU  ( 377 )      N
 368 HIS  ( 379 )      N
 369 GLU  ( 380 )      N
 370 SER  ( 381 )      N
 386 ARG  ( 397 )      N
 396 GLN  ( 407 )      N
 402 ILE  ( 413 )      N

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond acceptors

The buried side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors listed in the table below are not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors that are buried inside the protein normally form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any not hydrogen bonded in the optimized hydrogen bond network they will be listed here.

 167 GLU  ( 173 )      OE2
 252 GLN  ( 261 )      OE1
 378 ASN  ( 389 )      OD1

Final summary

Note: Summary report for users of a structure

This is an overall summary of the quality of the structure as compared with current reliable structures. This summary is most useful for biologists seeking a good structure to use for modelling calculations.

The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement constraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of constraint-independent quality indicators.


Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:

  1st generation packing quality :  -0.662
  2nd generation packing quality :  -0.229
  Ramachandran plot appearance   :  -1.588
  chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality  :  -0.823
  Backbone conformation          :   0.408

RMS Z-scores, should be close to 1.0:
  Bond lengths                   :   0.763
  Bond angles                    :   0.901
  Omega angle restraints         :   0.658 (tight)
  Side chain planarity           :   0.056 (tight)
  Improper dihedral distribution :   0.508
  B-factor distribution          :   1.986 (loose)
  Inside/Outside distribution    :   1.052