WHAT IF Check report

This file was created 1997-08-25 from WHAT_CHECK output by a conversion script. If you are new to WHAT_CHECK, please read the introduction to the output.

Verification log for sys\_human.lebe

Symmetry related problems

Error: Missing unit cell information

No SCALE matrix is given in the PDB file.

Error: Missing symmetry information

Problem: No CRYST1 card is given in the PDB file.

Atom coordinate problems and/or unexpected atoms

Note: No rounded coordinates detected

No significant rounding of atom coordinates has been detected.

Nomenclature related problems

Note: Valine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in valine nomenclature.

Note: Threonine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in threonine nomenclature.

Note: Isoleucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in isoleucine nomenclature.

Note: Leucine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in leucine nomenclature.

Note: Arginine nomenclature OK

No errors were detected in arginine nomenclature.

Note: Tyrosine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in tyrosine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Phenylalanine torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in phenylalanine torsion angle conventions.

Note: Aspartic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in aspartic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Glutamic acid torsion conventions OK

No errors were detected in glutamic acid torsion angle conventions.

Note: Heavy atom naming OK

No errors were detected in the atom names for non-hydrogen atoms.

Note: Chirality OK

All protein atoms have proper chirality.

Note: Improper dihedral angle distribution OK

The RMS Z-score for all improper dihedrals in the structure is within normal ranges.

Improper dihedral RMS Z-score : 0.518

Note: Chain names are OK

All chain names assigned to polymer molecules are unique, and all residue numbers are strictly increasing within each chain.

Note: Weights checked OK

All atomic occupancy factors ('weights') fall in the 0.0--1.0 range.

Geometric checks

Note: No missing atoms detected

All expected atoms are present.

Warning: C-terminal oxygen atoms missing

The C-atoms listed in the table below belong to a C-terminal residue in a protein chain, but the C-terminal oxygen ("O2" or "OXT") that it should be bound to was not found.

 408 MET  ( 423 )      C

Note: No extra C-terminal groups found

No C-terminal groups are present for non C-terminal residues

Note: All bond lengths OK

All bond lengths are in agreement with standard bond lengths using a tolerance of 4 sigma (both standard values and sigma for amino acid residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF])

Note: Normal bond length variability

Bond lengths were found to deviate normally from the standard bond lengths (values for Protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]).

RMS Z-score for bond lengths: 0.758
RMS-deviation in bond distances: 0.017

Note: No bond length directionality

Comparison of bond distances with Engh and Huber [REF] standard values for protein residues and Parkinson et al [REF] values for DNA/RNA does not show significant systematic deviations.

Note: All bond angles OK

All bond angles are in agreement with standard bond angles using a tolerance of 4 sigma (both standard values and sigma for protein residues have been taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al. [REF]). Please note that only bond angles within protein residues are taken into account: disulphide bridges and peptide bonds are neglected.

Note: Normal bond angle variability

Bond angles were found to deviate normally from the mean standard bond angles (normal values for protein residues were taken from Engh and Huber [REF], for DNA/RNA from Parkinson et al [REF]). The RMS Z-score given below is expected to be around 1.0 for a normally restrained data set, and this is indeed observed for very high resolution X-ray structures. More common values are around 1.55

RMS Z-score for bond angles: 0.895
RMS-deviation in bond angles: 1.776

Note: Side chain planarity OK

All of the side chains of residues that have a planar group are planar within expected RMS deviations.

Note: Atoms connected to aromatic rings OK

All of the atoms that are connected to planar aromatic rings in side chains of amino-acid residues are in the plane within expected RMS deviations.

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering amplitudes

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering amplitude that is outside of normal ranges. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings have a puckering amplitude Q between 0.20 and 0.45 Angstrom. If Q is lower than 0.20 Angstrom for a PRO residue, this could indicate disorder between the two different normal ring forms (with C-gamma below and above the ring, respectively). If Q is higher than 0.45 Angstrom something could have gone wrong during the refinement.

 184 PRO  ( 192 )     0.14 LOW
 188 PRO  ( 196 )     0.10 LOW

Warning: Unusual PRO puckering phases

The proline residues listed in the table below have a puckering phase that is not expected to occur in protein structures. Puckering parameters were calculated by the method of Cremer and Pople [REF]. Normal PRO rings approximately show a so-called envelope conformation with the C-gamma atom above the plane of the ring (phi=+72 degrees), or a half-chair conformation with C-gamma below and C-beta above the plane of the ring (phi=-90 degrees). If phi deviates strongly from these values, this is indicative of a very strange conformation for a PRO residue, and definitely requires a manual check of the data.

  22 PRO  (  24 )     47.4 half-chair C-delta/C-gamma (54 degrees)
 336 PRO  ( 348 )    103.0 envelop C-beta (108 degrees)

Warning: Torsion angle evaluation shows unusual residues

The residues listed in the table below contain bad or abnormal torsion angles.

These scores give an impression of how ``normal'' the torsion angles in protein residues are. All torsion angles except omega are used for calculating a `normality' score. Average values and standard deviations were obtained from the residues in the WHAT IF database. These are used to calculate Z-scores. A residue with a Z-score of below -2.0 is poor, and a score of less than -3.0 is worrying. For such residues more than one torsion angle is in a highly unlikely position.

 351 THR  ( 363 )   -2.8118
 336 PRO  ( 348 )   -2.8040
 335 PHE  ( 347 )   -2.4627
  19 PHE  (  21 )   -2.4174
 227 THR  ( 237 )   -2.3671
 378 MET  ( 392 )   -2.2233
 113 VAL  ( 119 )   -2.1872
 140 ASP  ( 147 )   -2.1660
 266 ARG  ( 276 )   -2.1063
 379 CYS  ( 393 )   -2.0761
 143 GLU  ( 150 )   -2.0612
 371 VAL  ( 385 )   -2.0320
 339 GLY  ( 351 )   -2.0213

Warning: Backbone torsion angle evaluation shows unusual conformations

The residues listed in the table below have abnormal backbone torsion angles.

Residues with ``forbidden'' phi-psi combinations are listed, as well as residues with unusual omega angles (deviating by more than 3 sigma from the normal value). Please note that it is normal if about 5 percent of the residues is listed here as having unusual phi-psi combinations.

  10 ASP  (  10 )   Poor phi/psi
  20 LYS  (  22 )   Poor phi/psi
  22 PRO  (  24 )   Poor PRO-phi
  60 PRO  (  64 )   Poor PRO-phi
  61 VAL  (  65 )   Poor phi/psi
 121 TRP  ( 127 )   Poor phi/psi
 151 ALA  ( 158 )   Poor phi/psi
 154 ARG  ( 161 )   Poor phi/psi
 200 ALA  ( 208 )   Poor phi/psi
 202 LEU  ( 210 )   omega poor
 218 GLU  ( 226 )   Poor phi/psi
 220 SER  ( 228 )   Poor phi/psi
 221 ASP  ( 229 )   Poor phi/psi
 238 ASP  ( 248 )   Poor phi/psi
 246 LEU  ( 256 )   PRO omega poor
 247 PRO  ( 257 )   Poor PRO-phi
 265 GLY  ( 275 )   Poor phi/psi
 266 ARG  ( 276 )   Poor phi/psi
 269 ARG  ( 279 )   Poor phi/psi
 270 GLY  ( 280 )   Poor phi/psi
 336 PRO  ( 348 )   Poor PRO-phi
 337 GLY  ( 349 )   Poor phi/psi
 344 LEU  ( 356 )   Poor phi/psi
 351 THR  ( 363 )   Poor phi/psi
 366 ASP  ( 380 )   Poor phi/psi
 378 MET  ( 392 )   omega poor

Note: Ramachandran Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the backbone conformations of all residues are corresponding to the known allowed areas in the Ramachandran plot is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

Ramachandran Z-score : -1.697

Warning: Omega angles too tightly restrained

The omega angles for trans-peptide bonds in a structure are expected to give a gaussian distribution with the average around +178 degrees and a standard deviation around 5.5 degrees. These expected values were obtained from very accurately determined structures. Many protein structures are too tightly constrained. This seems to be the case with the current structure, as the observed standard deviation is below 4.0 degrees.

Standard deviation of omega values : 3.441

Note: chi-1/chi-2 angle correlation Z-score OK

The score expressing how well the chi-1/chi-2 angles of all residues are corresponding to the populated areas in the database is within expected ranges for well-refined structures.

chi-1/chi-2 correlation Z-score : -0.903

Note: Ramachandran plot

In this Ramachandran plot X-signs represent glycines, squares represent prolines and small plus-signs represent the other residues. If too many plus-signs fall outside the contoured areas then the molecule is poorly refined (or worse).

In a colour picture, the residues that are part of a helix are shown in blue, strand residues in red. "Allowed" regions for helical residues are drawn in blue, for strand residues in red, and for all other residues in green.

Chain without chain identifier

Accessibility related checks

Note: Inside/Outside residue distribution normal

The distribution of residue types over the inside and the outside of the protein is normal.

inside/outside RMS Z-score : 1.095

Note: Inside/Outside RMS Z-score plot

The Inside/Outside distribution normality RMS Z-score over a 15 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. High areas in the plot (above 1.5) indicate unusual inside/outside patterns.

Chain without chain identifier

Secondary structure

Note: Secondary structure

This is the secondary structure according to DSSP. Only helix (H), strand (S), turn (T) and coil (blank) are shown. [REF]
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
DBG> SSBOND cards to be written: 0
                     10
                      |
    1 -  13  VLDLDLFRVDKGG
    1 -  13     HHHHHH T
                  20        30        40        50
                   |         |         |         |
   14 -  57  TQEKRFKDPGLVDQLVKADSEWRRCRFRADNLSKLKNLCSKTIG
   14 -  57   TT333T    HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
              60        70        80
               |         |         |
   58 -  86  KEPVGDDESVPENVLSFDDLTADALANLK
   58 -  86   TT    THHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
               90       100       110       120       130
                |         |         |         |         |
   87 - 130  EAERFENLREIGNLLHPSVPISNDEDVDNKVERIWGDCTVRKKY
   87 - 130   HHHHHHHHT      TTT   TT333       T     TT
                    140       150       160       170
                      |         |         |         |
  131 - 176  SHVDLVVMVDGFEGEKGAVVAGSRGYFLKGVLVFLEQALIQYALRT
  131 - 176   HHHHHHHTT   HHHHHHHT TT     HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
              180       190       200       210       220
                |         |         |         |         |
  177 - 223  LGSRGYIPIYTPFFMRKEVMQEVAQLSQFDEELYKVIGKGSEKSDDN
  177 - 223    TT        T   HHHHHHHT TTTT333T       TT
                 230       240       250       260       270       280
                   |         |         |         |         |         |
  224 - 283  LIATSEQPIAALHRDEWLRPEDLPIKYAGLSTCFRQEVGSHGRDTRGIFRVHQFEKIEQF
  224 - 283    T THHHHHHTTTT    333  SSSSSSSSSS T      TT  T    TSSSSSSSS
                 290
                   |
  284 - 292  VYSSPHDNK
  284 - 292  SS  333
                  300       310       320       330       340       350
                    |         |         |         |         |         |
  293 - 352  FEEMITTAEEFYQSLGIPYHIVNIVSGSLNHAASKKLDLEAWFPGSGAFRELVSCSNCTD
  293 - 352   HHHHHHHHHHHHHHT  SSSSS  TTTT TT TSSSSSSSSS333TSSSSSSSSSS TT
                  360
                    |
  353 - 363  YQARRLRIRYG
  353 - 363  HHHHHHT
                 370       380       390
                   |         |         |
  364 - 397  MMDKVEFVHMLNATMCATTRTICAILENYQTEKG
  364 - 397                T  HHHHHHHHHHHT  TT
             400
               |
  398 - 408  ITVPEKLKEFM
  398 - 408      TTT333
 
 
 

Bump checks

Error: Abnormally short interatomic distances

The pairs of atoms listed in the table below have an unusually short distance.

The contact distances of all atom pairs have been checked. Two atoms are said to `bump' if they are closer than the sum of their Van der Waals radii minus 0.40 Angstrom. For hydrogen bonded pairs a tolerance of 0.55 Angstrom is used. The first number in the table tells you how much shorter that specific contact is than the acceptable limit. The second distance is the distance between the centers of the two atoms.

The last text-item on each line represents the status of the atom pair. The text `INTRA' means that the bump is between atoms that are explicitly listed in the PDB file. `INTER' means it is an inter-symmetry bump. If the final column contains the text 'HB', the bump criterium was relaxed because there could be a hydrogen bond. Similarly relaxed criteria are used for 1--3 and 1--4 interactions (listed as 'B2' and 'B3', respectively). If the last column is 'BF', the sum of the B-factors of the atoms is higher than 80, which makes the appearance of the bump somewhat less severe because the atoms probably aren't there anyway.

Bumps between atoms for which the sum of their occupancies is lower than one are not reported. In any case, each bump is listed in only one direction.

  64 ASP  (  68 )      O    --   68 PRO  (  72 )      CD     1.305   1.495 INTRA
 243 PRO  ( 253 )      CD   --  363 GLY  ( 375 )      O      1.078   1.722 INTRA
 171 GLN  ( 178 )      CB   --  407 PHE  ( 422 )      CE2    1.054   2.146 INTRA
 171 GLN  ( 178 )      CG   --  407 PHE  ( 422 )      CE2    1.003   2.197 INTRA
 347 CYS  ( 359 )      SG   --  376 ALA  ( 390 )      CB     0.895   2.505 INTRA
  64 ASP  (  68 )      C    --   68 PRO  (  72 )      CD     0.625   2.575 INTRA
 108 SER  ( 114 )      CB   --  317 VAL  ( 329 )      CB     0.568   2.632 INTRA
 199 VAL  ( 207 )      O    --  200 ALA  ( 208 )      CB     0.561   2.239 INTRA
 228 SER  ( 238 )      OG   --  281 GLU  ( 291 )      CB     0.560   2.240 INTRA
 108 SER  ( 114 )      CB   --  317 VAL  ( 329 )      CG1    0.494   2.706 INTRA
 108 SER  ( 114 )      CB   --  113 VAL  ( 119 )      CB     0.487   2.713 INTRA
   7 PHE  (   7 )      CZ   --   97 ILE  ( 103 )      CD1    0.485   2.715 INTRA
 243 PRO  ( 253 )      CG   --  363 GLY  ( 375 )      O      0.474   2.326 INTRA
 171 GLN  ( 178 )      CB   --  407 PHE  ( 422 )      CD2    0.470   2.730 INTRA
  59 GLU  (  63 )      N    --   60 PRO  (  64 )      CD     0.452   2.548 INTRA
 113 VAL  ( 119 )      O    --  317 VAL  ( 329 )      CG1    0.419   2.381 INTRA
 198 GLU  ( 206 )      CB   --  358 LEU  ( 370 )      CG     0.414   2.786 INTRA
  19 PHE  (  21 )      CE1  --  101 LEU  ( 107 )      CB     0.403   2.797 INTRA
 203 SER  ( 211 )      O    --  206 ASP  ( 214 )      OD1    0.388   2.012 INTRA
 344 LEU  ( 356 )      CD2  --  383 ARG  ( 397 )      CB     0.377   2.823 INTRA
 293 PHE  ( 305 )      CE1  --  347 CYS  ( 359 )      O      0.377   2.423 INTRA
 347 CYS  ( 359 )      CB   --  376 ALA  ( 390 )      CB     0.363   2.837 INTRA
  19 PHE  (  21 )      CE1  --  318 SER  ( 330 )      CA     0.361   2.839 INTRA
 171 GLN  ( 178 )      CG   --  407 PHE  ( 422 )      CZ     0.355   2.845 INTRA
 296 MET  ( 308 )      CE   --  374 LEU  ( 388 )      CB     0.348   2.852 INTRA
And so on for a total of 249 lines

3D-database related checks

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment.

The packing environment of the residues is compared with the average packing environment for all residues of the same type in good PDB files. A low packing score can indicate one of several things: Poor packing, misthreading of the sequence through the density, crystal contacts, contacts with a co-factor, or the residue is part of the active site. It is not uncommon to see a few of these, but in any case this requires further inspection of the residue.

 186 TYR  ( 194 )    -8.31
 127 ARG  ( 133 )    -7.73
 269 ARG  ( 279 )    -7.50
 129 LYS  ( 135 )    -6.63
 215 LYS  ( 223 )    -6.55
 396 LYS  ( 410 )    -6.40
 365 MET  ( 379 )    -6.05
 219 LYS  ( 227 )    -5.68
 266 ARG  ( 276 )    -5.50
 180 ARG  ( 188 )    -5.43
 273 ARG  ( 283 )    -5.18
 289 HIS  ( 299 )    -5.12
 190 PHE  ( 198 )    -5.03

Warning: Abnormal packing environment for sequential residues

A stretch of at least three sequential residues with a questionable packing environment was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop, but might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue score of the series.

  18 ARG  (  20 )     ---   20 LYS  (  22 )      -4.44

Note: Structural average packing environment OK

The structural average quality control value is within normal ranges.

Average for range 1 - 408 : -0.985

Note: Quality value plot

The quality value smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -2.0) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Warning: Low packing Z-score for some residues

The residues listed in the table below have an unusual packing environment according to the 2nd generation quality check. The score listed in the table is a packing normality Z-score: positive means better than average, negative means worse than average. Only residues scoring less than -2.50 are listed here. These are the "unusual" residues in the structure, so it will be interesting to take a special look at them.

 289 HIS  ( 299 )    -3.08
 186 TYR  ( 194 )    -2.78
 213 ILE  ( 221 )    -2.73
 272 PHE  ( 282 )    -2.56

Warning: Abnormal packing Z-score for sequential residues

A stretch of at least four sequential residues with a 2nd generation packing Z-score below -1.75 was found. This could indicate that these residues are part of a strange loop or that the residues in this range are incomplete, but it might also be an indication of misthreading.

The table below lists the first and last residue in each stretch found, as well as the average residue Z-score of the series.

 123 ASP  ( 129 )     ---  126 VAL  ( 132 )      -2.33
 269 ARG  ( 279 )     ---  272 PHE  ( 282 )      -2.31

Note: Structural average packing Z-score OK

The structural average for the second generation quality control value is within normal ranges.

All contacts : Average = -0.264 Z-score = -1.59
BB-BB contacts : Average = 0.077 Z-score = 0.56
BB-SC contacts : Average = -0.460 Z-score = -2.44
SC-BB contacts : Average = 0.026 Z-score = 0.33
SC-SC contacts : Average = -0.412 Z-score = -1.95

Note: Second generation quality Z-score plot

The second generation quality Z-score smoothed over a 10 residue window is plotted as function of the residue number. Low areas in the plot (below -1.3) indicate "unusual" packing.

Chain without chain identifier

Note: Backbone oxygen evaluation OK

All residues for which the local backbone conformation could be found in the WHAT IF database have a normal backbone oxygen position.

Warning: Unusual rotamers

The residues listed in the table below have a rotamer that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. This option determines for every residue the position specific chi-1 rotamer distribution. Thereafter it verified whether the actual residue in the molecule has the most preferred rotamer or not. If the actual rotamer is the preferred one, the score is 1.0. If the actual rotamer is unique, the score is 0.0. If there are two preferred rotamers, with a population distribution of 3:2 and your rotamer sits in the lesser populated rotamer, the score will be 0.66. No value will be given if insufficient hits are found in the database.

It is not necessarily an error if a few residues have rotamer values below 0.3, but careful inspection of all residues with these low values could be worth it.

 402 GLU  ( 417 )     0.33

Warning: Unusual backbone conformations

For the residues listed in the table below, the backbone formed by itself and two neighboring residues on either side is in a conformation that is not seen very often in the database of solved protein structures. The number given in the table is the number of similar backbone conformations in the database with the same amino acid in the center.

For this check, backbone conformations are compared with database structures using C-alpha superpositions with some restraints on the backbone oxygen positions.

A residue mentioned in the table can be part of a strange loop, or there might be something wrong with it or its directly surrounding residues. There are a few of these in every protein, but in any case it is worth looking at!

  60 PRO  (  64 )    0
  61 VAL  (  65 )    0
 121 TRP  ( 127 )    0
 151 ALA  ( 158 )    0
 200 ALA  ( 208 )    0
 202 LEU  ( 210 )    0
 266 ARG  ( 276 )    0
 351 THR  ( 363 )    0
 378 MET  ( 392 )    0
 379 CYS  ( 393 )    0
 159 LYS  ( 166 )    1
 218 GLU  ( 226 )    1
 246 LEU  ( 256 )    1
 154 ARG  ( 161 )    2
 161 VAL  ( 168 )    2
 203 SER  ( 211 )    2
 220 SER  ( 228 )    2
 350 CYS  ( 362 )    2

Note: Backbone conformation Z-score OK

The backbone conformation analysis gives a score that is normal for well refined protein structures.

Backbone conformation Z-score : -0.105

B-factor analysis

Note: Average B-factor OK

The average B-factor of buried atoms is within expected values for a room-temperature X-ray study.

Average B-factor for buried atoms : 22.234

Note: Number of buried atoms with low B-factor is OK

For protein structures determined at room temperature, no more than about 1 percent of the B factors of buried atoms is below 5.0.

Percentage of buried atoms with B less than 5 : 0.07

Error: The B-factors of bonded atoms show signs of over-refinement

For each of the bond types in a protein a distribution was derived for the difference between the square roots of the B-factors of the two atoms. All bonds in the current protein were scored against these distributions. The number given below is the RMS Z-score over the structure. For a structure with completely restrained B-factors within residues, this value will be around 0.35, for extremely high resolution structures refined with free isotropic B-factors this number is expected to be near 1.0. Any value over 1.5 is sign of severe over-refinement of B-factors.

RMS Z-score : 2.100 over 2790 bonds
Average difference in B over a bond : 2.44
RMS difference in B over a bond : 6.24

Note: B-factor plot

The average atomic B-factor per residue is plotted as function of the residue number.

Chain without chain identifier

Hydrogen bond related checks

Error: HIS, ASN, GLN side chain flips

Listed here are Histidine, Asparagine or Glutamine residues for which the orientation determined from hydrogen bonding analysis are different from the assignment given in the input. Either they could form energetically more favorable hydrogen bonds if the terminal group was rotated by 180 degrees, or there is no assignment in the input file (atom type 'A') but an assignment could be made. If a residue is marked ``flexible'' the flipped conformation is only slightly better than the non-flipped conformation.

 264 HIS  ( 274 )
 282 GLN  ( 292 )
 291 ASN  ( 301 )
 315 ASN  ( 327 )
 349 ASN  ( 361 )

Note: Histidine type assignments

For all complete HIS residues in the structure a tentative assignment to HIS-D (protonated on ND1), HIS-E (protonated on NE2), or HIS-H (protonated on both ND1 and NE2, positively charged) is made based on the hydrogen bond network. A second assignment is made based on which of the Engh and Huber [REF] histidine geometries fits best to the structure.

In the table below all normal histidine residues are listed. The assignment based on the geometry of the residue is listed first, together with the RMS Z-score for the fit to the Engh and Huber parameters. For all residues where the H-bond assignment is different, the assignment is listed in the last columns, together with its RMS Z-score to the Engh and Huber parameters.

As always, the RMS Z-scores should be close to 1.0 if the residues were restrained to the Engh and Huber parameters during refinement.

Please note that because the differences between the geometries of the different types are small it is possible that the geometric assignment given here does not correspond to the type used in refinement. This is especially true if the RMS Z-scores are much higher than 1.0.

If the two assignments differ, or the ``geometry'' RMS Z-score is high, it is advisable to verify the hydrogen bond assignment, check the HIS type used during the refinement and possibly adjust it.

 102 HIS  ( 108 )     HIS-E   0.76
 132 HIS  ( 139 )     HIS-E   0.73 HIS-D   0.88
 236 HIS  ( 246 )     HIS-D   0.75
 264 HIS  ( 274 )     HIS-E   0.77
 275 HIS  ( 285 )     HIS-D   0.80
 289 HIS  ( 299 )     HIS-E   0.75
 312 HIS  ( 324 )     HIS-D   0.74 HIS-E   0.87
 323 HIS  ( 335 )     HIS-D   0.77 HIS-E   0.90
 372 HIS  ( 386 )     HIS-E   0.78 HIS-D   1.01

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond donors

The buried hydrogen bond donors listed in the table below have a hydrogen atom that is not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Hydrogen bond donors that are buried inside the protein normally use all of their hydrogens to form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any non hydrogen bonded buried hydrogen bond donors in the structure they will be listed here. In very good structures the number of listed atoms will tend to zero.

   1 VAL  (   1 )      N
   2 LEU  (   2 )      N
  15 GLN  (  17 )      N
  18 ARG  (  20 )      NE
  59 GLU  (  63 )      N
  62 GLY  (  66 )      N
  90 ARG  (  96 )      N
  95 ARG  ( 101 )      NE
 109 ASN  ( 115 )      N
 124 CYS  ( 130 )      N
 133 VAL  ( 140 )      N
 134 ASP  ( 141 )      N
 146 LYS  ( 153 )      N
 180 ARG  ( 188 )      N
 180 ARG  ( 188 )      NE
 180 ARG  ( 188 )      NH2
 182 TYR  ( 190 )      N
 190 PHE  ( 198 )      N
 201 GLN  ( 209 )      NE2
 203 SER  ( 211 )      OG
 204 GLN  ( 212 )      N
 210 TYR  ( 218 )      N
 226 ALA  ( 236 )      N
 227 THR  ( 237 )      N
 228 SER  ( 238 )      N
 244 GLU  ( 254 )      N
 269 ARG  ( 279 )      NH2
 270 GLY  ( 280 )      N
 304 TYR  ( 316 )      OH
 315 ASN  ( 327 )      ND2
 322 ASN  ( 334 )      N
 327 LYS  ( 339 )      N
 328 LYS  ( 340 )      N
 340 ALA  ( 352 )      N
 352 ASP  ( 364 )      N
 354 GLN  ( 366 )      N
 355 ALA  ( 367 )      N
 381 THR  ( 395 )      OG1
 383 ARG  ( 397 )      N
 393 GLN  ( 407 )      N
 394 THR  ( 408 )      N
 403 LYS  ( 418 )      N

Warning: Buried unsatisfied hydrogen bond acceptors

The buried side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors listed in the table below are not involved in a hydrogen bond in the optimized hydrogen bond network.

Side-chain hydrogen bond acceptors that are buried inside the protein normally form hydrogen bonds within the protein. If there are any not hydrogen bonded in the optimized hydrogen bond network they will be listed here.

 198 GLU  ( 206 )      OE1
 312 HIS  ( 324 )      ND1
 354 GLN  ( 366 )      OE1
 391 ASN  ( 405 )      OD1

Final summary

Note: Summary report for users of a structure

This is an overall summary of the quality of the structure as compared with current reliable structures. This summary is most useful for biologists seeking a good structure to use for modelling calculations.

The second part of the table mostly gives an impression of how well the model conforms to common refinement constraint values. The first part of the table shows a number of constraint-independent quality indicators.


Structure Z-scores, positive is better than average:

  1st generation packing quality :  -1.213
  2nd generation packing quality :  -1.593
  Ramachandran plot appearance   :  -1.697
  chi-1/chi-2 rotamer normality  :  -0.903
  Backbone conformation          :  -0.105

RMS Z-scores, should be close to 1.0:
  Bond lengths                   :   0.758
  Bond angles                    :   0.895
  Omega angle restraints         :   0.626 (tight)
  Side chain planarity           :   0.076 (tight)
  Improper dihedral distribution :   0.518
  B-factor distribution          :   2.100 (loose)
  Inside/Outside distribution    :   1.095